Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Is ChatGPT a more academic source than google searches for patient questions about hip arthroscopy? An analysis of the most frequently asked questions
6
Zitationen
6
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare the reliability and accuracy of responses provided to patients about hip arthroscopy (HA) by Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT), an artificial intelligence (AI) and large language model (LLM) online program, with those obtained through a contemporary Google Search for frequently asked questions (FAQs) regarding HA. METHODS: "HA" was entered into Google Search and ChatGPT, and the 15 most common FAQs and the answers were determined. In Google Search, the FAQs were obtained from the "People also ask" section. ChatGPT was queried to provide the 15 most common FAQs and subsequent answers. The Rothwell system groups the questions under 10 subheadings. Responses of ChatGPT and Google Search engines were compared. RESULTS: Timeline of recovery (23.3%) and technical details (20%) were the most common categories of questions. ChatGPT produced significantly more data in the technical details category (33.3% vs. 6.6%; p-value = 0.0455) than in the other categories. The most FAQs were academic in nature for both Google web search (46.6%) and ChatGPT (93.3%). ChatGPT provided significantly more academic references than Google web searches (93.3% vs. 46.6%). Conversely, Google web search cited more medical practice references (20% vs. 0%), single surgeon websites (26% vs. 0%), and government websites (6% vs. 0%) more frequently than ChatGPT. CONCLUSION: ChatGPT performed similarly to Google searches for information about HA. Compared to Google, ChatGPT provided significantly more academic sources for its answers to patient questions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.700 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.605 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 8.133 Zit.
BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining
2019 · 6.873 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.781 Zit.