Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
AI-based identification of patients who benefit from revascularization: a multicenter study
1
Zitationen
28
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
Background and Aims: Revascularization in stable coronary artery disease often relies on ischemia severity, but we introduce an AI-driven approach that uses clinical and imaging data to estimate individualized treatment effects and guide personalized decisions. Methods: Using a large, international registry from 13 centers, we developed an AI model to estimate individual treatment effects by simulating outcomes under alternative therapeutic strategies. The model was trained on an internal cohort constructed using 1:1 propensity score matching to emulate randomized controlled trials (RCTs), creating balanced patient pairs in which only the treatment strategy-early revascularization (defined as any procedure within 90 days of MPI) versus medical therapy-differed. This design allowed the model to estimate individualized treatment effects, forming the basis for counterfactual reasoning at the patient level. We then derived the AI-REVASC score, which quantifies the potential benefit, for each patient, of early revascularization. The score was validated in the held-out testing cohort using Cox regression. Results: Of 45,252 patients, 19,935 (44.1%) were female, median age 65 (IQR: 57-73). During a median follow-up of 3.6 years (IQR: 2.7-4.9), 4,323 (9.6%) experienced MI or death. The AI model identified a group (n=1,335, 5.9%) that benefits from early revascularization with a propensity-adjusted hazard ratio of 0.50 (95% CI: 0.25-1.00). Patients identified for early revascularization had higher prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and lower LVEF. Conclusions: This study pioneers a scalable, data-driven approach that emulates randomized trials using retrospective data. The AI-REVASC score enables precision revascularization decisions where guidelines and RCTs fall short.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.551 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.443 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.942 Zit.
BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining
2019 · 6.792 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.781 Zit.
Autoren
- Wenhao Zhang
- Robert JH Miller
- Krishna Patel
- Aakash Shanbhag
- Joanna X. Liang
- Mark A. Lemley
- Giselle Ramirez
- Valerie Builoff
- Jirong Yi
- Jianhang Zhou
- Paul Kavanagh
- Wanda Acampa
- Timothy M. Bateman
- Marcelo F. Di Carli
- Sharmila Dorbala
- Andrew J. Einstein
- Mathews B. Fish
- M. Timothy Hauser
- Terrence D. Ruddy
- Philipp A. Kaufmann
- Edward J. Miller
- Tali Sharir
- Mônica Martins
- Julian Halcox
- Panithaya Chareonthaitawee
- Damini Dey
- Daniel S. Berman
- Piotr J. Slomka
Institutionen
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center(US)
- University of Calgary(CA)
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai(US)
- University of Southern California(US)
- University of Naples Federico II(IT)
- Heart Imaging Technologies (United States)(US)
- Brigham and Women's Hospital(US)
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center(US)
- Providence Sacred Heart Medical Center(US)
- Sacred Heart Medical Center(US)
- Oklahoma Heart Hospital(US)
- University of Ottawa(CA)
- University Hospital of Zurich(CH)
- Yale University(US)
- Assuta Medical Center(IL)
- Swansea University(GB)
- Mayo Clinic in Arizona(US)