Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Perception, usage, and concerns of artificial intelligence applications among postgraduate dental students: cross-sectional study
13
Zitationen
5
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Future dental applications of artificial intelligence (AI) are anticipated to be widely adopted across all dental specialities. However, there are some concerns among many users about the accuracy of the given information. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate postgraduate' dental students' perception, usage, and concerns towards AI systems' applications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An online self-administered survey, consisting of 19 closed-ended questions in the English language, and a 3-point Likert-type scale was used to obtain a simple and straightforward response from participants in a "forced-choice" response format that was distributed to postgraduate dental students in the faculty of dentistry of multiple Universities. RESULTS: Younger participants and BDS holders are more likely to use AI-based software (p < 0.001), as well as showing more optimism about AI's potential to advance dentistry, whereas PhD holders are more skeptical about its integral role in healthcare (p < 0.001). Speciality influenced AI adoption significantly, with Endodontics showing the highest percentage (52.4% for 1 + years of AI usage; p = 0.006). Concerns about AI reliability and originality in research vary significantly by level of education and Speciality (p < 0.05). Younger participants show greater belief in AI's potential for major advancements in dentistry (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Postgraduate dental students generally perceive AI positively, recognizing its potential to enhance care. Usage remains moderate, with higher adoption in specialities like Endodontics and Periodontics. Concerns include AI's accuracy, ethical implications, and integration challenges, highlighting the need for further education and research. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.697 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.602 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 8.127 Zit.
BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining
2019 · 6.872 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.781 Zit.