Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Monitoring morphometric drift in lifelong learning segmentation of the spinal cord.
0
Zitationen
55
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
Morphometric measures derived from spinal cord segmentations can serve as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in neurological diseases and injuries affecting the spinal cord. For instance, the spinal cord cross-sectional area can be used to monitor cord atrophy in multiple sclerosis and to characterize compression in degenerative cervical myelopathy. While robust, automatic segmentation methods to a wide variety of contrasts and pathologies have been developed over the past few years, whether their predictions are stable as the model is updated using new datasets has not been assessed. This is particularly important for deriving normative values from healthy participants. In this study, we present a spinal cord segmentation model trained on a multisite (<i>n=75</i>) dataset, including 9 different MRI contrasts and several spinal cord pathologies. We also introduce a lifelong learning framework to automatically monitor the morphometric drift as the model is updated using additional datasets. The framework is triggered by an automatic GitHub Actions workflow every time a new model is created, recording the morphometric values derived from the model's predictions over time. As a <i>real-world</i> application of the proposed framework, we employed the spinal cord segmentation model to update a recently-introduced normative database of healthy participants containing commonly used measures of spinal cord morphometry. Results showed that: (i) our model performs well compared to its previous versions and existing pathology-specific models on the lumbar spinal cord, images with severe compression, and in the presence of intramedullary lesions and/or atrophy achieving an average Dice score of 0.95 ± 0.03; (ii) the automatic workflow for monitoring morphometric drift provides a quick feedback loop for developing future segmentation models; and (iii) the scaling factor required to update the database of morphometric measures is nearly constant among slices across the given vertebral levels, showing minimum drift between the current and previous versions of the model monitored by the framework. The model is freely available in Spinal Cord Toolbox v7.0.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis
2017 · 13.591 Zit.
nnU-Net: a self-configuring method for deep learning-based biomedical image segmentation
2020 · 7.739 Zit.
Calculation of average PSNR differences between RD-curves
2001 · 4.088 Zit.
Magnetic Resonance Classification of Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Degeneration
2001 · 3.897 Zit.
Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique
1993 · 3.609 Zit.
Autoren
- Enamundram Naga Karthik
- Sandrine Bédard
- Jan Valošek
- Christoph Stefan Aigner
- Elise Bannier
- Josef Bednařík
- Virginie Callot
- Anna Combes
- Armin Curt
- Gergely Dávid
- Falk Eippert
- Lynn Farner
- Michael G. Fehlings
- Patrick Freund
- Tobias Granberg
- Cristina Granziera
- Ulrike Horn
- Tomáš Horák
- Tomáš Horák
- Tomáš Horák
- Anne Kerbrat
- Nawal Kinany
- Nawal Kinany
- Shannon Kolind
- Anna Lebret
- Anna Lebret
- Lisa Eunyoung Lee
- Allan R. Martin
- Megan McGrath
- Megan McGrath
- Kristin P. O’Grady
- Kristin P. O’Grady
- Russell Ouellette
- Nikolai Pfender
- Nikolai Pfender
- Pierre‐François Pradat
- Pierre‐François Pradat
- Alexandre Prat
- Daniel S. Reich
- Ilaria Ricchi
- Vivien Chan
- Naama Rotem‐Kohavi
- Maryam Seif
- Andrew Smith
- Seth A. Smith
- Grace Sweeney
- Grace Sweeney
- Roger Tam
- Constantina A. Treaba
- Constantina A. Treaba
- Zachary Vavasour
- Zachary Vavasour
- Kenneth A. Weber
- Kenneth A. Weber
- Sarath Chandar
Institutionen
- Mila - Quebec Artificial Intelligence Institute(CA)
- Polytechnique Montréal(CA)
- Palacký University Olomouc(CZ)
- Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt(DE)
- Max Planck Institute for Human Development(DE)
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes(FR)
- Université de Rennes(FR)
- Masaryk University(CZ)
- University Hospital Brno(CZ)
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique(FR)
- Centre de Résonance Magnétique Biologique et Médicale(FR)
- Hôpital de la Timone(FR)
- Queen Mary University of London(GB)
- National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery(GB)
- University College London(GB)
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center(US)
- University of Zurich(CH)
- Universitätsklinik Balgrist(CH)
- Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences(DE)
- University Health Network(CA)
- University of Toronto(CA)
- Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging(GB)
- Karolinska University Hospital(SE)
- Karolinska Institutet(SE)
- Department of Biomedicine Basel(CH)
- Praxis Spinal Cord Institute(CA)
- Inserm(FR)
- Institut de Recherche en Informatique et Systèmes Aléatoires(FR)
- University of Geneva(CH)
- École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne(CH)
- University of British Columbia(CA)
- Central European Institute of Technology(CZ)
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging(US)
- University of California, Davis(US)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke(US)
- St. Michael's Hospital(CA)
- Stanford University(US)
- Sorbonne Université(FR)
- Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital(FR)
- Université de Montréal(CA)
- University of Chieti-Pescara(IT)
- Laboratory for Biomedical Neurosciences(CH)
- National Institutes of Health(US)
- University of Colorado Denver(US)
- Canadian Institute for Advanced Research(CA)
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine(CA)