Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Artificial intelligence in orthopedics: fundamentals, current applications, and future perspectives
6
Zitationen
7
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
Conventional diagnostic and therapeutic approaches in orthopedics are frequently time intensive and associated with elevated rates of diagnostic error, underscoring the urgent need for more efficient tools to improve the current situation. Recently, artificial intelligence (AI) has been increasingly integrated into orthopedic practice, providing data-driven approaches to support diagnostic and therapeutic processes. With the continuous advancement of AI technologies and their incorporation into routine orthopedic workflows, a comprehensive understanding of AI principles and their clinical applications has become increasingly essential. The review commences with a summary of the core concepts and historical evolution of AI, followed by an examination of machine learning and deep learning frameworks designed for orthopedic clinical and research applications. We then explore various AI-based applications in orthopedics, including image analysis, disease diagnosis, and treatment approaches such as surgical assistance, drug development, rehabilitation support, and personalized therapy. These applications are designed to help researchers and clinicians gain a deeper understanding of the current applications of AI in orthopedics. The review also highlights key challenges and limitations that affect the practical use of AI, such as data quality, model generalizability, and clinical validation. Finally, we discuss possible future directions for improving AI technologies and promoting their safe and effective integration into orthopedic care.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis
2017 · 13.607 Zit.
nnU-Net: a self-configuring method for deep learning-based biomedical image segmentation
2020 · 7.757 Zit.
Calculation of average PSNR differences between RD-curves
2001 · 4.088 Zit.
Magnetic Resonance Classification of Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Degeneration
2001 · 3.900 Zit.
Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique
1993 · 3.609 Zit.