OpenAlex · Aktualisierung stündlich · Letzte Aktualisierung: 30.03.2026, 23:08

Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.

Integrating Artificial Intelligence into Orthodontic Education: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Teaching Application

2025·3 Zitationen·Journal of Clinical MedicineOpen Access
Volltext beim Verlag öffnen

3

Zitationen

3

Autoren

2025

Jahr

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly emerging as a transformative force in healthcare education, including orthodontics. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the integration of AI into orthodontic training programs, focusing on its effectiveness in improving diagnostic accuracy, learner engagement, and the perceived quality of AI-generated educational content. <b>Materials and Methods</b>: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase through May 2025. Eligible studies involved AI-assisted educational interventions in orthodontics. A mixed-methods approach was applied, combining meta-analysis and narrative synthesis based on data availability and consistency. <b>Results</b>: Seven studies involving 1101 participants-including orthodontic students, clinicians, faculty, and program directors-were included. AI tools ranged from cephalometric landmarking platforms to ChatGPT-based learning modules. A fixed-effects meta-analysis using two studies yielded a pooled Global Quality Scale (GQS) score of 3.69 (95% CI: 3.58-3.80), indicating moderate perceived quality of AI-generated content (I<sup>2</sup> = 64.5%). Due to methodological heterogeneity and limited statistical reporting in most studies, a narrative synthesis was used to summarize additional outcomes. AI tools enhanced diagnostic skills, learner autonomy, and perceived satisfaction, particularly among students and junior faculty. However, barriers such as limited curricular integration, lack of training, and faculty skepticism were recurrent. <b>Conclusions</b>: AI technologies, especially ChatGPT and digital cephalometry tools, show promise in orthodontic education. While learners demonstrate high acceptance, full integration is hindered by institutional and perceptual challenges. Strategic curricular reforms and targeted faculty development are needed to optimize AI adoption in clinical training.

Ähnliche Arbeiten