Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Evaluating large language models as clinical laboratory test recommenders in primary and emergency care: a crucial step in clinical decision making
3
Zitationen
3
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Large language models (LLMs), such as OpenAI's GPT-4o, have demonstrated considerable promise in transforming clinical decision support systems. In this study, we focused on a single but crucial task of clinical decision-making: laboratory test ordering. METHODS: We evaluated the self-consistency and performance of GPT-4o as a laboratory test recommender for 15 simulated clinical cases of different complexities across primary and emergency care settings. Through two prompting strategies - zero-shot and chain-of-thought - the model's recommendations were evaluated against expert consensus-derived gold-standard laboratory test orders categorized into essential and conditional test orders. RESULTS: We found that GPT-4o exhibited high self-consistency across repeated prompts, surpassing the consistency observed among individual expert orders in the earliest round of consensus. Precision was moderate to high for both prompting strategies (68-82 %), although relatively lower recall (41-51 %) highlighted a risk of underutilization. A detailed analysis of false negatives (FNs) and false positives (FPs) could explain some gaps in recall and precision. Notably, variability in recommendations centered primarily on conditional tests, reflecting the broader diagnostic uncertainty that can arise in diverse clinical contexts. Our analysis revealed that neither prompting strategy, case complexity, nor clinical context significantly affected GPT-4o's performance. CONCLUSIONS: This work underscores the promise of LLMs in optimizing laboratory test ordering while identifying gaps for enhancing their alignment with clinical practice. Future research should focus on real-world implementation, integrating clinician feedback, and ensuring alignment with local test menus and guidelines to improve both performance and trust in LLM-driven clinical decision support.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.764 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.674 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 8.234 Zit.
BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining
2019 · 6.898 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.781 Zit.