Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of oral and maxillofacial surgeons towards the use of artificial intelligence in clinical practice and training: a cross-sectional study
0
Zitationen
5
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMS) clinicians and trainees relating to the use of artificial intelligence (AI) within OMS practice and training. Methods: A cross-sectional survey study was conducted with OMS specialists and trainees in Singapore regarding their views on AI in OMS. The survey comprised 25 questions over five sections, and was distributed via an online survey platform. Results: < 0.05). Participants cited concerns about inaccurate diagnoses or plans (77.1%), overdependence (70.8%), privacy/security concerns (41.7%), and increased healthcare costs (41.7%). Although most participants reported using AI in daily life (68.8%) and noted that AI made the completion of tasks easier (62.5%), most have not incorporated AI into their clinical practice (62.5%), and felt that inadequately trained or equipped to do so (79.2% and 58.3% respectively). Conclusion: OMS specialists and trainees in Singapore generally have optimistic views toward AI, with younger respondents tending towards more positive attitudes. The levels of knowledge and practice leave room for improvement.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.700 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.605 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 8.133 Zit.
BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining
2019 · 6.873 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.781 Zit.