Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
User experience of Tool for Addressing Conflicts of Interest in Trials (TACIT) prototype: interview and questionnaire study
1
Zitationen
6
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
This study describes user experience of a prototype of a tool for addressing conflicts of interest in randomized clinical trials included in systematic reviews. Eleven participants who had published multiple Cochrane Reviews gave feedback in interviews after using the tool in a virtual training module. Fourteen additional review teams gave feedback via a questionnaire after having used the tool in their own systematic reviews. Users generally had a positive experience, but adaptations to make the tool easier to use were suggested. The feedback guided a subsequent tool adjustment, including development of an Excel-based application. Based on our experience, we also provide a short guide for planning piloting of future study appraisal tools.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects
2003 · 10.819 Zit.
Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample
2005 · 8.954 Zit.
SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials
2013 · 6.963 Zit.
The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research
2020 · 5.256 Zit.
The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines
2019 · 4.563 Zit.