OpenAlex · Aktualisierung stündlich · Letzte Aktualisierung: 23.05.2026, 18:12

Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.

AGENTIC AI IN HEALTHCARE & MEDICINE: A SEVEN-DIMENSIONAL TAXONOMY FOR EMPIRICAL EVALUATION OF LLM-BASED AGENTS

2025·0 ZitationenOpen Access
Volltext beim Verlag öffnen

0

Zitationen

3

Autoren

2025

Jahr

Abstract

Agentic AI, realized as Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents that plan, use tools and act has begun to shape healthcare and medicine. They have been proven to excel at numerous tasks ranging from EHR analysis and differential diagnosis to treatment planning and research workflows. Yet the literature lacks a consistent lens to compare designs and appraise evidence. We review 49 studies and introduce a seven-dimensional taxonomy: Cognitive Capabilities, Knowledge Management, Interaction Patterns, Adaptation & Learning, Safety & Ethics, Framework Typology and Core Tasks & Subtasks with 29 operational sub-dimensions. Using explicit inclusion and exclusion criteria and a labeling rubric (Fully Implemented ✓, Partially Implemented ∆, Not Implemented ✗), we map each study to the taxonomy and report quantitative summaries of capability prevalence and co-occurrence patterns. Our empirical analysis surfaces clear asymmetries. For instance, the External Knowledge Integration sub-dimension under Knowledge Management is commonly realized (∼76% ✓) whereas Event-Triggered Activation sub-dimenison under Interaction Patterns is largely absent (∼92% ✗) and Drift Detection & Mitigation sub-dimension under Adaptation & Learning is rare (∼98% ✗). Architecturally, Multi-Agent Design sub-dimension under Framework Typology is the dominant pattern (∼82% ✓) while orchestration layers remain mostly partial. Across Core Tasks & Subtasks, information centric capabilities lead e.g., Medical Question Answering & Decision Support and Benchmarking & Simulation, while action and discovery oriented areas such as Treatment Planning & Prescription still show substantial gaps (∼59% ✗). Together, these findings provide an empirical baseline indicating that current agents excel at retrieval-grounded advising but require stronger adaptation and compliance platforms to move from early-stage systems to dependable clinical systems.

Ähnliche Arbeiten