Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
When AI speaks like a specialist: ChatGPT-4 in the management of inflammatory bowel disease
0
Zitationen
18
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is gaining traction in healthcare, especially for patients' education. Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) require continuous engagement, yet the quality of online information accessed by patients is inconsistent. ChatGPT, a generative AI model, has shown promise in medical scenarios, but its role in IBD communication needs further evaluation. The objective of this study was to assess the quality of ChatGPT-4's responses to common patient questions about IBD, compared to those provided by experienced IBD specialists. Methods: Twenty-five frequently asked questions were collected during routine IBD outpatient visits and categorized into five themes: pregnancy/breastfeeding, diet, vaccinations, lifestyle, and medical therapy/surgery. Each question was answered by ChatGPT-4 and by two expert gastroenterologists. Responses were anonymized and evaluated by 12 physicians (six IBD experts and six non-experts) using a 5-point Likert scale across four dimensions: accuracy, reliability, comprehensibility, and actionability. Evaluators also attempted to identify whether responses were AI- or human-generated. Results: < 0.001). The best-rated scenarios were medical therapy and surgery; the diet scenario consistently received lower scores. Only 33% of AI-generated responses were correctly identified as such, indicating strong similarity to human-written answers. Both expert and non-expert evaluators rated AI responses highly, though IBD specialists gave higher ratings overall. Conclusion: ChatGPT-4 generated high-quality, clear, and actionable responses to IBD-related patient questions, often outperforming human experts. Its outputs were frequently indistinguishable from those written by physicians, suggesting potential as a supportive tool for patient education. Nonetheless, further studies are needed to assess real-world application and ensure appropriate use in personalized clinical care.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.697 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.602 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 8.127 Zit.
BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining
2019 · 6.872 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.781 Zit.
Autoren
Institutionen
- Policlinico Tor Vergata(IT)
- University of Miami(US)
- University of Rome Tor Vergata(IT)
- Carlo Forlanini Hospital(IT)
- University of Cambridge(GB)
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust(GB)
- Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic(IT)
- Centro Clinico Nemo(IT)
- Hospices Civils de Lyon(FR)
- Hôpital Edouard Herriot(FR)
- Administração Regional de Saúde de Lisboa e Vale do Tejo(PT)
- Algarve Biomedical Center(PT)