Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Are Artificial Intelligence-generated Patient Leaflets Ready for Clinical Use? A Readability Comparison across Common Orthopaedic Procedures
0
Zitationen
2
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
While LLMs offer promising avenues for scalable health communication, current AI-generated PILs do not consistently meet recommended readability standards. Professionally authored leaflets remain more accessible for the average patient. These findings highlight the ongoing need for clinician oversight and quality assurance when integrating AI into patient education materials.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
2009 · 63.039 Zit.
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
2008 · 25.033 Zit.
GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
2008 · 21.206 Zit.
The National Comprehensive Cancer Network
1998 · 16.869 Zit.
Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't
1996 · 15.545 Zit.