Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Toward sustainable AI leadership: ethical blind spots, accountability gaps and the CARE governance framework
2
Zitationen
2
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
Purpose This conceptual paper addresses the growing concern of leadership accountability and power asymmetries in AI-integrated organizations. It proposes a structured framework to navigate the ethical, institutional and technical blind spots that often go unnoticed in AI governance. Design/methodology/approach Drawing on interdisciplinary literature from leadership studies, AI ethics and organizational governance, the paper synthesizes insights to propose a novel theoretical framework (“CARE”) for responsible AI oversight. Findings The study identifies three dimensions of leadership negligence, technical, ethical and institutional, that create accountability gaps and obscure power dynamics in AI systems. The CARE Framework (Control, Awareness, Responsibility and Evaluation) guides leaders in assessing and addressing these gaps across different sectors. Originality/value This paper contributes a practical, theory-informed model for ethical AI leadership and provides a foundation for future empirical studies. It bridges fragmented discussions across disciplines and informs both scholars and practitioners aiming to implement trustworthy, power-aware AI systems.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.336 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.207 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.607 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.476 Zit.