Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Comparison of machine learning methods versus traditional Cox regression for survival prediction in cancer using real-world data: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis
3
Zitationen
7
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
ML models had similar performance compared with CPH models in predicting cancer survival outcomes. Although this systematic review highlights the promising use of ML to improve the quality of care in oncology, findings from this review also suggest opportunities to improve ML reporting transparency. Future systematic reviews should focus on the comparative performance between specific ML models and CPH regression in time-to-event outcomes in specific type of cancer or other disease areas.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis
2017 · 13.607 Zit.
Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks
2017 · 13.216 Zit.
A survey on Image Data Augmentation for Deep Learning
2019 · 11.832 Zit.
QuPath: Open source software for digital pathology image analysis
2017 · 8.206 Zit.
Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data
2015 · 8.028 Zit.