Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Evaluating the accuracy and reproducibility of ChatGPT responses in the context of cochlear implantation
1
Zitationen
4
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The use of ChatGPT in the field of otolaryngology is increasing; however, there are not enough studies related to cochlear implants. AIM/OBJECTIVES: To assess the accuracy and reproducibility of ChatGPT (GPT-4o) responses to questions about cochlear implantation, evaluating its potential role in patient education. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 104 questions across five categories (basic, preoperative, surgical, postoperative care, postoperative expectations) were selected from reliable online sources. Each was posed twice to ChatGPT-4o in separate sessions. Responses were graded by two reviewers for accuracy (comprehensive/correct, partially correct, misleading, or incorrect/irrelevant). Reproducibility was assessed based on consistency across sessions. Discrepancies were resolved by a third expert reviewer. RESULTS: = 0.348). CONCLUSION AND SIGNIFICANCE: ChatGPT provided highly accurate and reproducible responses to cochlear implant-related questions, supporting its use as an educational tool. Nonetheless, expert review remains essential for complex or critical topics.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.578 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.470 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.984 Zit.
BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining
2019 · 6.814 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.781 Zit.