Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Who uses AI in research, and for what? Large-scale survey evidence from Germany
5
Zitationen
7
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
The integration of AI into scientific work holds significant potential to accelerate innovation. We surveyed researchers in two leading German research organizations to examine AI adoption, barriers, and perceived impact on research. Researchers are widely using AI tools – often for primary and creative tasks – and many expect the technology to be transformative for research. Effective use appears linked to both hands-on experience and engagement with learning resources. A persistent gender gap in AI use is closely associated with differences in familiarity, suggesting a potential focus for organizational efforts. Legal uncertainty and privacy concerns also emerge as major barriers, with researchers calling for clear, high-level regulatory guidance. Overall, our findings suggest directions where institutional actions might be explored to promote more equitable and effective AI adoption. • Over 6000 researchers were surveyed across two major German research organizations. • Researchers actively use AI, including for core and creative research tasks. • Gender gap in AI use largely reflects differences in familiarity, not attitudes. • Researchers cite legal uncertainty as a major barrier to AI adoption.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines
2019 · 4.575 Zit.
The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settings
2016 · 3.867 Zit.
Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance
2004 · 3.415 Zit.
Fairness through awareness
2012 · 3.278 Zit.
Mind over Machine: The Power of Human Intuition and Expertise in the Era of the Computer
1987 · 3.183 Zit.