Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Comparative assessment of AI models in addressing questions on priapism
0
Zitationen
2
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
ChatGPT and Gemini were statistically comparable in generating reliable, clinically useful responses, making them valuable tools for medical education and patient counseling. Copilot, however, exhibited lower accuracy and applicability. These findings highlight the need for continuous refinement of AI models to enhance their role in clinical decision-making while ensuring human expertise remains central to patient care.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.336 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.207 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.607 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.476 Zit.