Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Comparison of ChatGPT-4o and expert evaluation in endodontic education: a cross-sectional pilot study
0
Zitationen
5
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
AI-generated feedback was moderately useful to students, but expert feedback consistently scored higher. For complex psychomotor skills and radiographic interpretation, AI should serve as an auxiliary tool rather than an independent assessor. Further validation of advanced multimodal AI systems and development of hybrid frameworks combining algorithmic objectivity with expert judgment are recommended.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.513 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.407 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.882 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.781 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.571 Zit.