Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Human-AI teaming in healthcare: 1 + 1 > 2?
3
Zitationen
4
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
While humans and AI-powered machines are expected to complement each other—for example, leveraging human creativity alongside AI’s computational power to achieve synergy (“1 + 1 > 2”)—the extent to which human–machine teaming (HMT) realizes this potential remains uncertain. We investigated this issue through reliability analysis of data from 52 empirical studies in clinical settings. Results show that medical AI can augment clinician performance, yet HMT rarely achieves full complementarity. Two factors matter: (1) teaming mode, with the simultaneous mode (clinicians review diagnostic cases and AI outputs concurrently) yielding greater benefits than the sequential mode (clinicians make initial judgments before reviewing AI outputs); and (2) clinician expertise, with juniors benefiting more than seniors. We also addressed two practical questions for medical AI deployment: how to predict or explain HMT reliability, and how to achieve clinically significant improvements. These findings advance understanding of human–AI collaboration in safety-critical domains.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.561 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.452 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.948 Zit.
BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining
2019 · 6.797 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.781 Zit.