Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
I, ChatGPT: linguistic properties and human experiences of human- versus AI-generated stories
1
Zitationen
4
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
Abstract Generative AI is increasingly used to create texts, including fictional stories. Do stories generated by AI differ from stories created by humans regarding linguistic properties and recipients’ experiences? To answer these questions, we first asked ChatGPT and 100 non-professional human authors (i.e., students) to create stories based on similar prompts (Study 1). Linguistic analyses showed that ChatGPT stories included fewer personal pronouns and fewer descriptions of relativity than human stories, but more positive emotions. In Study 2 ( N = 380), naïve participants were randomly assigned to read an AI-generated or a human story from the pool of 200 stories from Study 1. No differences in novelty or entertainment experiences were found, but the readers of AI stories were less transported into the story world. Mediation analyses show that this difference can be attributed to ChatGPT’s use of fewer personal pronouns. Differences in the use of literary techniques between AI and humans are discussed.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.339 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.211 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.614 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.478 Zit.