Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Comparative study of the performance of ChatGPT-4, Claude, Gemini, Mistral, and perplexity on multiple-choice questions in cardiology
0
Zitationen
8
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
Despite variations in their performance profiles, these five LLMs studied have relatively similar capabilities for answering well-structured cardiology multiple-choice questions. They could therefore be valuable tools in medical education in our resource-limited context.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.339 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.211 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.614 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.478 Zit.