OpenAlex · Aktualisierung stündlich · Letzte Aktualisierung: 23.05.2026, 08:06

Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.

Neuroimaging‐based artificial intelligence for predicting dementia progression in a diverse real‐world memory clinic cohort

2025·0 Zitationen·Alzheimer s & DementiaOpen Access
Volltext beim Verlag öffnen

0

Zitationen

5

Autoren

2025

Jahr

Abstract

Abstract Background Existing applications of artificial intelligence for dementia prediction have largely relied on the use of large, curated research datasets for developing and evaluating model performance. Despite reported high accuracies, a significant gap remains in assessing their generalisability to real‐world data. Method 3D T1‐weighted magnetic resonance imaging scans were extracted from the South London and Maudsley Hospital (SLaM) NHS Trust and linked with de‐identified electronic health records via the Clinical Record Interactive Search database. This was used to identify 1140 individuals (self‐reported ethnicities: 19.7% Black/African/Caribbean, 11.0% Asian, 58.4% British/White, 10.4% Mixed/Other/Unknown) who received a scan at least 3 months prior to a dementia diagnosis or had a scan but no record of dementia (Biondo 2022, NeuroImage: Clinical). 3D ResNet models were trained using MRI from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center and the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, to classify individuals with Alzheimer's disease dementia from cognitively unimpaired individuals. First, the trained models were used to classify dementia patients from those with no dementia in the SLaM cohort using MRI only. Then, imaging‐based model probabilities of Alzheimer's disease dementia (p AD ) were combined with covariates of age, sex and MMSE score in a Cox proportional hazards (Cox‐PH) regression model to estimate the time between the scan and recorded diagnosis. Data was right‐censored to account for individuals with no record of dementia. Result Classification accuracies ranged from 65.3%‐68.6% as shown in Table 1. The hazard ratios for each covariate are summarised in Table 2. The p AD hazard ratios [95% CI] were 3.58 [2.79,4.61], 4.67 [3.46,6.30] and 4.35 [3.34,5.67] for models trained on NACC, ADNI and both datasets respectively, and were all statistically significant (α=0.0017). Kaplan Meier curves and Cox‐PH partial effect plots for p AD are shown in Figure 1. Conclusion Models trained on large, research cohorts are effective at predicting progression to dementia for real‐world NHS patients, despite differences in the sample characteristics. p AD was significant at estimating time‐to‐diagnosis, with a 0.1 increase in p AD equating to a 13.6%‐16.7% increased risk of receiving a dementia diagnosis within 8 years. These findings demonstrate the clinical utility of generalisable artificial intelligence models in a real‐world context.

Ähnliche Arbeiten