Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Artificial intelligence and academic integrity: exploring plagiarism in Ecuadorian universities
1
Zitationen
4
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
Plagiarism in higher education has long been a concern, exacerbated by the emergence of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI), which has heightened worries about academic integrity. This study examined the association between GenAI use and self-reported plagiarism among university students in Ecuador. Data were collected from 4,811 students across eight universities through a validated questionnaire (α = 0.73) that explored academic and non-academic technology use. A binary logistic regression was applied, with plagiarism level as the dependent variable. The model explained 20.2% of the variance (Nagelkerke R² = 0.202) and identified key predictors: reporting the use of ChatGPT to instructors (OR = 1.223, p < 0.001) and trusting ChatGPT-generated information (OR = 1.176, p < 0.001) were positively associated with plagiarism, while perceiving that AI improves academic performance (OR = 0.945, p < 0.01) and possessing broader knowledge of AI tools (OR = 0.911, p < 0.01) were associated with lower plagiarism levels. Although the study’s cross-sectional design limits causal inference, findings highlight the importance of ethical awareness, digital literacy, and institutional policies for responsible GenAI integration. This research contributes to understanding how GenAI use interacts with academic integrity in higher education and informs evidence-based approaches to promote ethical and transparent learning practices.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications
2022 · 2.691 Zit.
Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach
1998 · 2.524 Zit.
Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling
2012 · 2.323 Zit.
Comparison of Two Methods to Detect Publication Bias in Meta-analysis
2006 · 2.223 Zit.
How Does ChatGPT Perform on the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE)? The Implications of Large Language Models for Medical Education and Knowledge Assessment
2023 · 1.993 Zit.