Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Comparing the performance of four mainstream large language models on medical literature review generation: a human expert evaluation in SMILE surgery
0
Zitationen
16
Autoren
2026
Jahr
Abstract
Rather than excelling universally, LLMs exhibit distinct and task-specific strengths that mandate a task-driven, hybrid strategy in tool selection. Reference fabrication was found to be a pervasive issue across all models, regardless of the task topic, elevating human verification from a best practice to an essential safeguard for academic integrity.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.349 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.219 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.631 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.480 Zit.
Autoren
Institutionen
- Nanchang University(CN)
- Sun Yat-sen University(CN)
- Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University(CN)
- Third Hospital of Nanchang(CN)
- Shanghai Eye Disease Prevention & Treatment Center(CN)
- Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University(CN)
- He Eye Hospital(CN)
- First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University(CN)
- The Central Hospital of Xiao gan(CN)
- Xiaogan First People's Hospital(CN)
- ShenZhen People’s Hospital(CN)
- First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University(CN)
- First Hospital of Xi'an(CN)