Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Adoption of artificial intelligence in primary health care: systematic synthesis of stakeholder perspectives
0
Zitationen
7
Autoren
2026
Jahr
Abstract
Primary care, the cornerstone of healthcare systems, faces increasing pressures from aging populations, chronic diseases, and resource constraints. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers transformative potential to enhance diagnostic accuracy, streamline workflows, and improve patient outcomes. However, its integration into primary care is challenged by technical, ethical, and organizational barriers. This systematic review examines AI’s role in primary care, focusing on stakeholder perspectives and implementation dynamics. A systematic synthesis of qualitative studies was conducted following Noblit and Hare’s framework and Braun and Clarke’s thematic analysis. Searches spanned PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, and grey literature (2015–2025), identifying qualitative studies on AI in primary care. Studies were screened using predefined criteria, with quality assessed via the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist. Data were extracted systematically and synthesized, with initial search for 1416 studies. Finally, 23 studies from diverse regions (e.g., UK, USA, Australia, Cameroon) and involving stakeholders like physicians, patients, and policymakers were included. Six themes emerged: Barriers (technical, organizational, policy, knowledge, cultural), Facilitators (benefits, trust, support systems, evidence), Impact on Healthcare Delivery (workflow, decision-making, roles, engagement), Ethical/Legal/Social Implications (privacy, accountability, equity, public perception), Stakeholder Perspectives, and Future Directions. AI improved efficiency and diagnostics but faced challenges like data quality, trust deficits, and ethical concerns. AI holds significant promise for transforming primary care by enhancing efficiency and patient care, but its adoption is hindered by multifaceted barriers from stakeholder perspectives. Transparent AI systems, robust training, and ethical frameworks are crucial to build trust and ensure equity. Future research should focus on longitudinal impacts and inclusive strategies to align AI with primary care’s patient-centered ethos.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.339 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.211 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.614 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.478 Zit.