Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Artificial intelligence-based classification of Spitz tumors
0
Zitationen
13
Autoren
2026
Jahr
Abstract
Spitz tumors are diagnostically challenging due to overlap in atypical histological features with conventional melanomas. We investigated to what extent artificial intelligence (AI) models, using histological and/or clinical features, can: (1) distinguish Spitz tumors from conventional melanomas; (2) predict the underlying genetic aberration of Spitz tumors; and (3) predict the diagnostic category of Spitz tumors. The AI models were developed and validated using a retrospective cohort from the University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands. The dataset consisted of 393 Spitz tumors and 379 conventional melanomas. Predictive performance was measured using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and the accuracy. The performance of the AI models was compared with that of four experienced pathologists in a reader study. Moreover, a simulation experiment was conducted to investigate the impact of implementing AI-based recommendations for ancillary diagnostic testing on the workflow of the pathology department. The best AI model based on UNI features reached an AUROC of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.92-0.98) and an accuracy of 0.86 (95% CI, 0.81-0.91) in differentiating Spitz tumors from conventional melanomas. The genetic aberration was predicted with an accuracy of 0.55 (95% CI, 0.46-0.64) compared to 0.25 for randomly guessing. The diagnostic category was predicted with an accuracy of 0.51 (95% CI, 0.40-0.60), where random chance-level accuracy equaled 0.33. On all three tasks, the AI models performed better than the four pathologists, although differences were not statistically significant for most individual comparisons. Based on the simulation experiment, implementing AI-based recommendations for ancillary diagnostic testing could reduce material costs, turnaround times, and examinations. In conclusion, the AI models achieved a strong predictive performance in distinguishing between Spitz tumors and conventional melanomas. On the more challenging tasks of predicting the genetic aberration and the diagnostic category of Spitz tumors, the AI models performed better than random chance.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)
2008 · 28.906 Zit.
TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours
1987 · 16.123 Zit.
A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis
2017 · 13.591 Zit.
Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Screening
2011 · 10.770 Zit.
The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual and the Future of TNM
2010 · 9.110 Zit.
Autoren
Institutionen
- Utrecht University(NL)
- University Medical Center Utrecht(NL)
- Eindhoven University of Technology(NL)
- Leiden University Medical Center(NL)
- Radboud University Nijmegen(NL)
- Radboud University Medical Center(NL)
- Meander Medisch Centrum(NL)
- Erasmus MC(NL)
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers(NL)
- St. Antonius Ziekenhuis(NL)