Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Context Is What You Need: The Maximum Effective Context Window for Real World Limits of LLMs
0
Zitationen
1
Autoren
2026
Jahr
Abstract
Large language model (LLM) providers boast big numbers for maximum context window sizes. To test the real-world use of context windows, we 1) define a concept of maximum effective context window, 2) formulate a testing method of a context window’s effectiveness over various sizes and problem types, and 3) create a standardized way to compare model efficacy for increasingly larger context window sizes to find the point of failure. We collected hundreds of thousands of data points across several models and found significant differences between the reported Maximum Context Window (MCW) size and the Maximum Effective Context Window (MECW) size. Our findings show that the MECW is not only drastically different from the MCW but also shifts based on the problem type. A few top-of-the-line models in our test group failed with as few as 100 tokens in context; most had severe degradation in accuracy by 1000 tokens in context. All models fell far short of their Maximum Context Window by as much as >99%. Our data reveals the Maximum Effective Context Window shifts based on the type of problem provided, offering clear and actionable insights into how to improve model accuracy and decrease model hallucination rates.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.635 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.543 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 8.051 Zit.
BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining
2019 · 6.844 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.781 Zit.