Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Can large language models be trusted? Reliability and readability of responses to perinatal depression FAQs
0
Zitationen
7
Autoren
2026
Jahr
Abstract
Most LLMs demonstrated moderate to high reliability when responding to perinatal depression questions, supporting their potential as supplementary sources of health information. However, readability levels above recommended benchmarks suggest that current outputs may remain challenging for individuals with lower health literacy. While LLMs improve information accessibility, further improvements in readability, source attribution, and ethical transparency are needed to maximize public benefit and support equitable health communication. Future work should focus on defining and standardizing safety behaviors in high-risk mental health contexts to enable reliable clinical deployment.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Improving the Quality of Web Surveys: The Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES)
2004 · 6.125 Zit.
The content validity index: Are you sure you know what's being reported? critique and recommendations
2006 · 6.078 Zit.
Health literacy and public health: A systematic review and integration of definitions and models
2012 · 5.827 Zit.
Low Health Literacy and Health Outcomes: An Updated Systematic Review
2011 · 5.209 Zit.
Health literacy as a public health goal: a challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st century
2000 · 4.932 Zit.