Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
How do students regulate their learning with a genAI chatbot?
0
Zitationen
2
Autoren
2026
Jahr
Abstract
Self-regulated learning (SRL) is essential for effective learning, yet students often struggle to regulate in digital environments, including suboptimal learning tool use. The rapid integration of generative AI (e.g., ChatGPT) into learning settings raises questions about their role in supporting or hindering SRL. This exploratory study investigated how students’ SRL in a technology-enhanced learning environment with a genAI tool was associated with learning processes and performance. Thirty university students were tasked to read texts and write an essay within 45 minutes. Learning performance was measured using knowledge and transfer tests, and the essay. SRL processes were measured using trace-based SRL event analysis and learner-genAI interaction with chatbot log events and coded queries. Most students (73%) used the chatbot voluntarily, primarily for seeking information. Chatbot users achieved higher essay scores than non-users. Chatbot interaction frequencies correlated positively with high cognitive activities; durations of chatbot use and high cognition negatively correlated with reading time. Qualitative data indicated reliance on the chatbot to summarise and extract key points, suggesting offloading of learning. Findings highlight potential performance benefits but also risks of outsourcing critical SRL processes to genAI. Implications point to instructional and tool design that align technological advances with educational fit.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
An Experiment in Linguistic Synthesis with a Fuzzy Logic Controller
1999 · 5.632 Zit.
An experiment in linguistic synthesis with a fuzzy logic controller
1975 · 5.559 Zit.
A FRAMEWORK FOR REPRESENTING KNOWLEDGE
1988 · 4.548 Zit.
Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy
2023 · 3.342 Zit.