Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Who Is Really Deciding? AI and Clinical Judgement in Dentistry
0
Zitationen
1
Autoren
2026
Jahr
Abstract
The integration of AI in dental practice, primarily through AI-enabled software, influences clinical workflows by promoting rapid decision-making and potentially increasing bias stemming from its automation bias. While these systems demonstrate high accuracy in standardised evaluations, their real-world performance, particularly in atypical cases, remains less validated. This reliance on AI necessitates a broader AI literacy in clinicians, focusing on ethical awareness and critical judgement rather than solely technical proficiency. Ongoing evaluation of AI systems must encompass their impact on clinical reasoning, and dental education should prepare professionals to discern when to slow down their intuitive judgements in response to algorithmic insights to enhance clinical accountability and trust.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.391 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.257 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.685 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.781 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.501 Zit.