Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Perceptions of Registered Dietitian Nutritionists (RDNs) on the Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Clinical Nutrition Care: A Cross-Sectional Survey Within a Large U.S. Healthcare System
0
Zitationen
9
Autoren
2026
Jahr
Abstract
<b>Background:</b> Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being integrated into healthcare, with applications ranging from predictive analytics to clinical decision support. In clinical nutrition, AI tools offer opportunities to improve workflow efficiency, enhance dietary assessment, and personalize nutrition care. Despite growing interest, little is known about registered dietitian nutritionists' (RDNs) perceptions of AI in clinical practice. The aim of the present study was to assess RDNs' attitudes toward AI use within a large healthcare system, along with their perceived barriers in this regard. <b>Methods:</b> A cross-sectional survey was developed through expert review and distributed electronically via REDCap to RDNs across Mayo Clinic's academic campuses and affiliated health system sites. The 23-item survey included Likert-scale items addressing AI's potential utilization within clinical care, perceived benefits and risks, and readiness for adoption. Responses were summarized using descriptive statistics. Factor analysis identified underlying constructs related to AI attitudes. Differences stratified by age and years of experience were evaluated using ANOVA. <b>Results:</b> Of the 185 RDNs invited, 64 (35%) responded. Two factors emerged: optimism regarding AI usage (Cronbach's α = 0.94) and skepticism about implementation (α = 0.76). The overall mean ± SD score for optimism was 0.1 ± 0.6 (neutral), while skepticism averaged 1.0 ± 0.6 (moderate). Skepticism differed by years of experience (<i>p</i> = 0.012), with the lowest levels observed among RDNs with ≥21 years of practice. No significant differences were observed across age groups. <b>Discussion:</b> RDNs demonstrated neutral attitudes toward AI use but expressed concerns about accuracy, training, and implementation challenges. Addressing these concerns through education and structured implementation strategies may facilitate successful adoption of AI in dietetic practice.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
In Search of Excellence
1984 · 4.060 Zit.
Recommended Dietary Allowances.
1991 · 3.923 Zit.
ESPEN guidelines on definitions and terminology of clinical nutrition
2016 · 2.435 Zit.
Diagnostic criteria for malnutrition – An ESPEN Consensus Statement
2015 · 1.724 Zit.
GLIM criteria for the diagnosis of malnutrition – A consensus report from the global clinical nutrition community
2019 · 1.630 Zit.