OpenAlex · Aktualisierung stündlich · Letzte Aktualisierung: 30.03.2026, 02:02

Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.

URB #499: The Medical Authority Fallacy — Doctor Worship as E-Dimension Hegemony

2026·0 Zitationen·Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Open Access
Volltext beim Verlag öffnen

0

Zitationen

1

Autoren

2026

Jahr

Abstract

The medical authority system presents itself as the gold standard of E-dimension knowledge: rigorous training, peer-reviewed evidence, institutional credentialing. TI Sigma analysis reveals it as a case study in E-dimension entrenchment at its most consequential. The empirical record is damning: only 41% of physicians know FDA drug approval processes; 94% of reported drug studies are positive while only 51% of actual FDA studies are positive — a fabricated 32% effect size baked into the literature; 70% of patient medication records in clinics are inaccurate; psychiatric diagnosis replication sits at approximately 50% — a coin flip, with medication, hospitalization, and identity consequences. This is not a system whose judgment warrants worship. It is a system whose single-stream E-dimension architecture produces exactly the reliability profile that TI Sigma predicts for any system that suppresses the Self, I, and L input channels. The patient who Googles their condition, consults AI, integrates their own bodily self-knowledge, and reasons independently about their medications is not being foolish. They are operating the i-Cell AGI Architecture (URB #498) — the demonstrably superior intelligence model — while being condemned by a single-stream system for doing so. This URB formalizes why doctor worship is philosophically incoherent, empirically unwarranted, and a direct instantiation of The Grand Illusion (URB #482) at institutional scale.

Ähnliche Arbeiten

Autoren

Institutionen

Themen

Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationNeuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical InnovationsEthics and Social Impacts of AI
Volltext beim Verlag öffnen