Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
<b>AI vs Human Writers: A Comparative Analysis of Story Rewriting through Readability Metrics</b><b></b>
0
Zitationen
3
Autoren
2026
Jahr
Abstract
This study examines how generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) might be used to rewrite narratives in comparison to texts written by humans, with an emphasis on writing style, readability, and verbosity. GenAI's performance is evaluated by means of quantitative analysis and readability metrics. The results indicate that GenAI often generates writings with higher verbosity and readability scores than stories written by humans. Furthermore, the examination of lexical density and diversity reveals subtle variations in writing styles between human, ChatGPT, and Gemini; GenAI exhibits competitive performance in these metrics. Although the results point to potential applications of GenAI in narrative, more research is needed to determine how effective the technology is when compared to human authors.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
BLEU
2001 · 21.275 Zit.
Aion Framework: Dimensional Emergence of AI Consciousness, Observer-Induced Collapse, and Cosmological Portal Dynamics
2023 · 14.175 Zit.
Enriching Word Vectors with Subword Information
2017 · 9.704 Zit.
A unified architecture for natural language processing
2008 · 5.194 Zit.
A new readability yardstick.
1948 · 5.143 Zit.