Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
ETHICAL CHALLENGES OF AI DECISION-MAKING IN HEALTHCARE
0
Zitationen
10
Autoren
2026
Jahr
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) increasingly supports clinical decision-making in healthcare systems, offering opportunities to improve diagnostic accuracy, treatment planning, and operational efficiency. However, integrating AI technologies introduces significant ethical issues related to algorithmic prejudice, transparency, accountability, patient autonomy, and data governance. This narrative literature review examines ethical issues associated with AI-based decision-making in healthcare by synthesizing contemporary scientific literature. A structured search strategy was applied across major scientific databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, focusing on publications from 2015 to 2025 that address ethical aspects of AI in clinical contexts. The analysis identified recurring ethical themes, including fairness, explainability, responsibility distribution, and trust in human–AI collaboration. Evidence indicates that although AI enhances evidence-based practice, unresolved ethical risks may affect clinical accountability and patient trust. The study points out the need for evidence-based administrative frameworks and multidisciplinary collaboration to ensure ethical integration of AI technologies into healthcare decision-making procedures.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.549 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.443 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.941 Zit.
BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining
2019 · 6.792 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.781 Zit.