OpenAlex · Aktualisierung stündlich · Letzte Aktualisierung: 20.05.2026, 07:40

Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.

Cloud-Based Large Language Model Deployment: A Comparative Analysis of Serverless and Bring-Your-Own-Container Architectures

2026·0 Zitationen·Acta Informatica PragensiaOpen Access
Volltext beim Verlag öffnen

0

Zitationen

1

Autoren

2026

Jahr

Abstract

Background: Large Language Models (LLMs) have transformed research and industry applications; however, cloud deployment decisions remain complex and poorly documented, particularly for academic researchers operating under budget constraints.Systematic guidance on infrastructure selection for LLM-based research is limited.Objective: This study provides a comprehensive empirical evaluation of cloud-based LLM deployment architectures, examining inference efficiency, serverless platform availability, and architectural tradeoffs across major cloud providers to deliver actionable guidance for budget-constrained researchers.Methods: The author evaluated 32 open-source LLMs ranging from 0.6 billion to 1 trillion parameters across serverless and Bring Your Own Container (BYOC) deployment configurations.Using the Belebele benchmark, we analyzed cost-efficiency relationships, serverless platform availability, and metrics exposure across Amazon SageMaker, Amazon Bedrock, Azure Serverless, and Hugging Facecompatible providers.Results: Model performance follows a logarithmic scaling relationship with parameter count (R=0.727)and deployment cost (R=0.639).Models in the 30-50B parameter range achieve 85-90% of maximum accuracy at a fraction of the cost of frontier models.However, serverless availability remains fragmented: only 34.4% of examined models are accessible via serverless endpoints, with minimal cross-platform redundancy (6.2%).Deployment architecture introduces a fundamental trade-off: serverless platforms expose 71% fewer metrics than BYOC approaches while eliminating infrastructure management overhead and idle costs.Conclusion: These findings provide practical guidance for researchers selecting cloud infrastructure under budget constraints.Models in the 7-14B range offer optimal cost efficiency, while the 30-50B range maximizes accuracy per dollar for demanding tasks.The results also challenge the prevailing emphasis on ever-larger models, as diminishing returns become substantial beyond 30B parameters.Persistent gaps in serverless availability and observability highlight the need for greater standardization in cloud platforms.

Ähnliche Arbeiten

Autoren

Institutionen

Themen

Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationMachine Learning in Materials ScienceNatural Language Processing Techniques
Volltext beim Verlag öffnen