Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Cloud-Based Large Language Model Deployment: A Comparative Analysis of Serverless and Bring-Your-Own-Container Architectures
0
Zitationen
1
Autoren
2026
Jahr
Abstract
Background: Large Language Models (LLMs) have transformed research and industry applications; however, cloud deployment decisions remain complex and poorly documented, particularly for academic researchers operating under budget constraints.Systematic guidance on infrastructure selection for LLM-based research is limited.Objective: This study provides a comprehensive empirical evaluation of cloud-based LLM deployment architectures, examining inference efficiency, serverless platform availability, and architectural tradeoffs across major cloud providers to deliver actionable guidance for budget-constrained researchers.Methods: The author evaluated 32 open-source LLMs ranging from 0.6 billion to 1 trillion parameters across serverless and Bring Your Own Container (BYOC) deployment configurations.Using the Belebele benchmark, we analyzed cost-efficiency relationships, serverless platform availability, and metrics exposure across Amazon SageMaker, Amazon Bedrock, Azure Serverless, and Hugging Facecompatible providers.Results: Model performance follows a logarithmic scaling relationship with parameter count (R=0.727)and deployment cost (R=0.639).Models in the 30-50B parameter range achieve 85-90% of maximum accuracy at a fraction of the cost of frontier models.However, serverless availability remains fragmented: only 34.4% of examined models are accessible via serverless endpoints, with minimal cross-platform redundancy (6.2%).Deployment architecture introduces a fundamental trade-off: serverless platforms expose 71% fewer metrics than BYOC approaches while eliminating infrastructure management overhead and idle costs.Conclusion: These findings provide practical guidance for researchers selecting cloud infrastructure under budget constraints.Models in the 7-14B range offer optimal cost efficiency, while the 30-50B range maximizes accuracy per dollar for demanding tasks.The results also challenge the prevailing emphasis on ever-larger models, as diminishing returns become substantial beyond 30B parameters.Persistent gaps in serverless availability and observability highlight the need for greater standardization in cloud platforms.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.707 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.613 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 8.159 Zit.
BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining
2019 · 6.875 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.781 Zit.