Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A1123 STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR TRUSTWORTHY AI DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION IN STROKE
0
Zitationen
18
Autoren
2026
Jahr
Abstract
Abstract Background and aims Artificial intelligence (AI)–based clinical decision support systems (CDSS) are increasingly explored in acute stroke care. While high-level principles for trustworthy AI (TAI) exist, practical guidance for implementing these principles is limited. This hinders safe clinical adoption. We aimed to provide a transparent and reproducible framework to translate TAI principles into practice for CDSS in stroke care. Methods Within the EU Horizon project “VALIDATE”, we applied a multi-method approach to operationalize TAI in stroke CDSS development. We conducted participatory co-creation workshops, an external expert assessment using the Z-Inspection methodology®, semi-structured interviews with domain experts, and bi-annual internal audits with work package leads to elicit project-specific requirements. Results We identified key steps for the development and validation of TAI in stroke care. Early stakeholder engagement enables translation of ethical principles into concrete system specifications. Continuous internal governance and structured feedback mechanisms facilitate monitoring of ethical requirements and timely issue identification. Together, these processes improve transparency and align ethical governance with technical and clinical workflows. We further identified practical challenges - such as resource availability, hospital infrastructure, patient recruitment, and timing - along with recommendations for addressing them. We consolidated these findings into a comprehensive Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). Conclusions Our work provides a practical, process-oriented guide for TAI development and validation. The SOP will support future projects, helping to enhance trustworthiness, transparency and clinical safety of CDSS in stroke care. Conflict of interest All listed authors, main, presenting and other: Nothing to disclose.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.674 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.583 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 8.105 Zit.
BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining
2019 · 6.862 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.781 Zit.
Autoren
Institutionen
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin(DE)
- Northern Ohio Recovery Association(US)
- Heidelberg University(DE)
- University Hospital Heidelberg(DE)
- Chirurgische Universitätsklinik Heidelberg(DE)
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin(DE)
- Trinity College Dublin(IE)
- Hadassah Medical Center(IL)
- Simula Metropolitan Center for Digital Engineering(NO)
- Hebron University(PS)
- Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca(ES)
- empirica - Communication and Technology Research(DE)
- Digital Science (United States)(US)