Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Artificial intelligence applications in sport-related concussion: an updated scoping review
0
Zitationen
9
Autoren
2026
Jahr
Abstract
ObjectivesSport-related concussion (SRC) is a complex mild traumatic brain injury for which diagnosis, monitoring, and prognosis remain largely reliant on subjective clinical assessment.Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a potential tool to enhance objectivity by integrating highdimensional, multimodal data across the SRC care pathway.Design: Scoping review. MethodsA systematic literature search was conducted across six databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, SPORTDiscus, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central) from inception to December 2025.Eligible studies were classified into four domains: Detection & Diagnosis, Monitoring & Surveillance, Prognosis & Recovery, and Prevention & Risk Modelling.Results Fifty-five studies met the inclusion criteria, with over 80% published since 2020.Detection & Diagnosis was the most represented domain, primarily leveraging EEG, speech, motor, and multimodal clinical data.Monitoring & Surveillance studies focused on wearable sensors, mouthguards, and video-based impact detection to quantify exposure and reduce false positives.Prognosis & Recovery models explored recovery trajectories, persistent symptoms, and reinjury risk, while Prevention & Risk Modelling studies predominantly relied on biomechanical and finite element-derived data to estimate injury risk.Despite promising performance, studies were highly heterogeneous and frequently limited by small or imbalanced samples, inconsistent outcome definitions, limited external validation, and poor model interpretability Conclusion AI-based approaches show growing potential to support SRC management across multiple clinical domains.However, current evidence supports their use primarily as decision-support tools.Future research should prioritise large, multicentre studies, transparent labelling strategies, explainable AI frameworks, and rigorous external validation to enable safe and clinically meaningful implementation.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
2021 · 91.427 Zit.
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement
2015 · 26.303 Zit.
Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses
2010 · 17.463 Zit.
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
2021 · 13.326 Zit.
ASSESSMENT OF COMA AND IMPAIRED CONSCIOUSNESS
1974 · 13.073 Zit.