Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
How individual participant data meta-analyses have influenced trial design, conduct, and analysis
2015·57 Zitationen·Journal of Clinical EpidemiologyOpen Access
Volltext beim Verlag öffnen57
Zitationen
38
Autoren
2015
Jahr
Abstract
IPD meta-analysis could be better used to inform the design, conduct, analysis, and interpretation of trials.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
2021 · 86.337 Zit.
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
2009 · 82.855 Zit.
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
1977 · 77.141 Zit.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
2009 · 62.966 Zit.
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
2003 · 61.652 Zit.
Autoren
- Jayne F. Tierney
- Jean‐Pierre Pignon
- Francois Gueffyier
- Mike Clarke
- Lisa Askie
- Claire L. Vale
- Sarah Burdett
- Priscilla Alderson
- Lisa Askie
- Derrick Bennett
- Sarah Burdett
- Mike Clarke
- Sara Simões Dias
- Jonathan Emberson
- F. Gueyffier
- Alfonso Iorio
- Malcolm Macleod
- Ben W. Mol
- Carl Moons
- Mahesh Parmar
- Rafael Perera
- Bob Phillips
- Jean‐Pierre Pignon
- Jon Rees
- Hans Reitsma
- Richard D Riley
- Maroeska M. Rovers
- Larysa Rydzewska
- Christopher H. Schmid
- Sasha Shepperd
- Sally Stenning
- Lesley Stewart
- Jayne F. Tierney
- Catrin Tudur Smith
- Claire L. Vale
- Jeffrey A. Welge
- Ian R. White
- William Whiteley
Institutionen
Themen
Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsEthics in Clinical ResearchArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education