Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Comparison of a traditional systematic review approach with review-of-reviews and semi-automation as strategies to update the evidence
37
Zitationen
5
Autoren
2020
Jahr
Abstract
Two approaches to rapidly update SRs-review-of-reviews and semi-automation-failed to demonstrate reduced workload burden while maintaining an acceptable level of sensitivity. We suggest careful evaluation of the ROR approach through comparison of inclusion criteria and targeted searches to fill evidence gaps as well as further research of semi-automation use, including more study of highly curated training sets.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
2021 · 86.337 Zit.
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
2009 · 82.855 Zit.
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
1977 · 77.141 Zit.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
2009 · 62.966 Zit.
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
2003 · 61.652 Zit.