Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Toward Automated Data Extraction According to Tabular Data Structure: Cross-sectional Pilot Survey of the Comparative Clinical Literature
8
Zitationen
3
Autoren
2021
Jahr
Abstract
In this cross-sectional pilot review, we found a high density of information in tables, but with major heterogeneity in presentation of measurement context. The highest-density studies reported both baseline and outcome measures in tables, with arm-level breakout, intervention labels, and arm sizes present, and reported both the statistic formats and units. The measurement context formats presented here, broadly classified into three classes that cover 92% (71/78) of studies, form a basis for understanding the frequency of different reporting styles, supporting automated detection of the data format for extraction of metrics.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
2021 · 89.782 Zit.
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
2009 · 83.047 Zit.
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
1977 · 77.858 Zit.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
2009 · 63.446 Zit.
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
2003 · 62.102 Zit.