Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of 18 Deep Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) Models with Transfer Learning to Diagnose COVID-19 on Chest X-Ray (CXR) Images
53
Zitationen
6
Autoren
2023
Jahr
Abstract
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a disease caused by a novel strain of coronavirus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), severely affecting the lungs. Our study aims to combine both quantitative and qualitative analysis of the convolutional neural network (CNN) model to diagnose COVID-19 on chest X-ray (CXR) images. We investigated 18 state-of-the-art CNN models with transfer learning, which include AlexNet, DarkNet-19, DarkNet-53, DenseNet-201, GoogLeNet, Inception-ResNet-v2, Inception-v3, MobileNet-v2, NasNet-Large, NasNet-Mobile, ResNet-18, ResNet-50, ResNet-101, ShuffleNet, SqueezeNet, VGG-16, VGG-19, and Xception. Their performances were evaluated quantitatively using six assessment metrics: specificity, sensitivity, precision, negative predictive value (NPV), accuracy, and F1-score. The top four models with accuracy higher than 90% are VGG-16, ResNet-101, VGG-19, and SqueezeNet. The accuracy of these top four models is between 90.7% and 94.3%; the F1-score is between 90.8% and 94.3%. The VGG-16 scored the highest accuracy of 94.3% and F1-score of 94.3%. The majority voting with all the 18 CNN models and top 4 models produced an accuracy of 93.0% and 94.0%, respectively. The top four and bottom three models were chosen for the qualitative analysis. A gradient-weighted class activation mapping (Grad-CAM) was used to visualize the significant region of activation for the decision-making of image classification. Two certified radiologists performed blinded subjective voting on the Grad-CAM images in comparison with their diagnosis. The qualitative analysis showed that SqueezeNet is the closest model to the diagnosis of two certified radiologists. It demonstrated a competitively good accuracy of 90.7% and F1-score of 90.8% with 111 times fewer parameters and 7.7 times faster than VGG-16. Therefore, this study recommends both VGG-16 and SqueezeNet as additional tools for the diagnosis of COVID-19.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study
2020 · 22.617 Zit.
La certeza de lo impredecible: Cultura Educación y Sociedad en tiempos de COVID19
2020 · 19.271 Zit.
A Multi-Modal Distributed Real-Time IoT System for Urban Traffic Control (Invited Paper)
2024 · 14.265 Zit.
UNet++: A Nested U-Net Architecture for Medical Image Segmentation
2018 · 8.567 Zit.
Review of deep learning: concepts, CNN architectures, challenges, applications, future directions
2021 · 7.181 Zit.