OpenAlex · Aktualisierung stündlich · Letzte Aktualisierung: 17.05.2026, 23:44

Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.

Evaluating AI Competence in Specialized Medicine: Comparative Analysis of ChatGPT and Neurologists in a Neurology Specialist Examination in Spain

2024·12 Zitationen·JMIR Medical EducationOpen Access
Volltext beim Verlag öffnen

12

Zitationen

2

Autoren

2024

Jahr

Abstract

Background: With the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) in various fields, evaluating its application in specialized medical contexts becomes crucial. ChatGPT, a large language model developed by OpenAI, has shown potential in diverse applications, including medicine. Objective: This study aims to compare the performance of ChatGPT with that of attending neurologists in a real neurology specialist examination conducted in the Valencian Community, Spain, assessing the AI's capabilities and limitations in medical knowledge. Methods: We conducted a comparative analysis using the 2022 neurology specialist examination results from 120 neurologists and responses generated by ChatGPT versions 3.5 and 4. The examination consisted of 80 multiple-choice questions, with a focus on clinical neurology and health legislation. Questions were classified according to Bloom's Taxonomy. Statistical analysis of performance, including the κ coefficient for response consistency, was performed. Results: Human participants exhibited a median score of 5.91 (IQR: 4.93-6.76), with 32 neurologists failing to pass. ChatGPT-3.5 ranked 116th out of 122, answering 54.5% of questions correctly (score 3.94). ChatGPT-4 showed marked improvement, ranking 17th with 81.8% of correct answers (score 7.57), surpassing several human specialists. No significant variations were observed in the performance on lower-order questions versus higher-order questions. Additionally, ChatGPT-4 demonstrated increased interrater reliability, as reflected by a higher κ coefficient of 0.73, compared to ChatGPT-3.5's coefficient of 0.69. Conclusions: This study underscores the evolving capabilities of AI in medical knowledge assessment, particularly in specialized fields. ChatGPT-4's performance, outperforming the median score of human participants in a rigorous neurology examination, represents a significant milestone in AI development, suggesting its potential as an effective tool in specialized medical education and assessment.

Ähnliche Arbeiten

Autoren

Institutionen

Themen

Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic SkillsExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Volltext beim Verlag öffnen