Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Can large language models fully automate or partially assist paper selection in systematic reviews?
15
Zitationen
13
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
Our findings suggest LLMs are not yet capable of autonomously identifying and selecting relevant papers in systematic reviews. However, they hold promise as an assistive tool to improve the efficiency of the paper selection process in systematic reviews.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
2021 · 86.228 Zit.
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
2009 · 82.853 Zit.
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
1977 · 77.129 Zit.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
2009 · 62.956 Zit.
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
2003 · 61.639 Zit.
Autoren
Institutionen
- Tsinghua University(CN)
- Peking University(CN)
- Singapore National Eye Center(SG)
- Singapore Eye Research Institute(SG)
- National University of Singapore(SG)
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University(CN)
- Sun Yat-sen University(CN)
- Beihang University(CN)
- Johns Hopkins University(US)
- Moorfields Eye Hospital(GB)
- University College London(GB)
- Beijing Tsinghua Chang Gung Hospital(CN)
- McMaster University(CA)
- Duke-NUS Medical School(SG)