Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Generative artificial intelligence (GAI) usage guidelines for scholarly publishing: a cross-sectional study of medical journals
15
Zitationen
11
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
Although most medical journals provided their own GAI usage guidelines or referenced external guidelines, some recommendations remained unspecified (e.g., whether AI can be used for data analysis and interpretation). Additionally, journals with lower SJR scores were less likely to provide guidelines, indicating a potential gap that warrants attention. Collaborative efforts are needed to develop specific recommendations that better guide authors and reviewers.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.357 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.221 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.640 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.482 Zit.
Autoren
Institutionen
- Iowa State University(US)
- Zhejiang University(CN)
- University of Macau(MO)
- University of Pennsylvania(US)
- Columbia University(US)
- Harbin Institute of Technology(CN)
- City University of Macau(MO)
- Hong Kong Virtual University(CN)
- University of Hong Kong(HK)
- University of Michigan(US)
- Institute for Social Research(NO)