Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Automating content analysis of scientific abstracts using ChatGPT: A methodological protocol and use case
3
Zitationen
3
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
This paper presents a protocol for using ChatGPT to perform content analysis. The protocol involves converting a codebook, outlining categories, descriptions, coding rules, and possible values, into a structured prompt that guides ChatGPT's analysis. The protocol was validated through analysis of 980 research articles to identify research approaches and data collection methods. ChatGPT achieved high performance in identifying data collection methods, but faced challenges with poorly defined or underrepresented categories, particularly in mixed methods research. Overall, while it scored well for quantitative (0.96) and qualitative (0.82) studies, it struggled with mixed methods (0.60), highlighting the need for clear methodological definitions.•The protocol enhances coding efficiency and demonstrates the feasibility of using AI for content analysis, potentially streamlining the coding process in research.•Challenges arose in categories that were not clearly defined (big data), underrepresented (ethnography), or hierarchically related (Interview & Discourse/Textual analysis).•Interrater metrics indicated a substantial level of agreement, reinforcing the potential of ChatGPT in content analysis while emphasizing the importance of clear methodological definitions.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
2021 · 86.482 Zit.
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
2009 · 82.861 Zit.
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
1977 · 77.165 Zit.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
2009 · 62.983 Zit.
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
2003 · 61.676 Zit.